Welcome, Guest. Please Login.

Gang Stalking World

Sep 7th, 2010, 12:43pm
News:
Home Help Search Login


Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Sharing their Conspiracy on the Internet (Read 1205 times)
Gangstalking
Administrator
*****


Happy New Year

Posts: 4175
Sharing their Conspiracy on the Internet
Nov 16th, 2008, 6:26am
 
Quote:


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/13/fashion/13psych.html?partner=rss&emc=rss


http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/11/13/style/13psych.php


Sharing their Conspiracy on the Internet.


This is a quick follow up to the article sharing their Demons on the Web that came out November 13, 2008 in the New York Times.


I don't know how many of our website visitors out there have had a chance to read and digest this article that just came out in the New York Times and also ran in several other International papers, but I thought this would be a wonderful opportunity to shed some additional light on some portions of the article.


The Internet is a modern marvel of mankind. I have seen parents who's children are ill, and they have used every expert that the offline world can throw at them, only to fail. I have seen those same parents type in a few key words, and find help, love, support, and many times the answers that they were seeking. I personally see a similar pattern when it comes to those seeking help or assistance for their Gang Stalking.

They are seeking help and assistance, they have tried all forms of offline support and to no avail. Some have been on medication, thought of suicide, or are at their wits end, and then they find these sites. They find they are not alone, they find that their symptoms that they thought no one else would ever believe, are common place and everyday for the members of this community. They find understanding. Using these websites is a matter of choice, and when traditional practices have failed, then these websites have come to the forefront for help, support and even healing.


This quite lengthy and delightful article starts of by saying:

"FOR years they lived in solitary terror of the light beams that caused searing headaches, the technology that took control of their minds and bodies. They feared the stalkers, people whose voices shouted from the walls or screamed in their heads, “We found you” and “We want you dead.”


For the targets of Gang Stalking the harassment is often subtle and leaves very little trace. That is why it has for years been very difficult to muster up any support or awareness of what is happening to us. If voices were shouting from walls, many of us within the community would have been quite capable of going getting a tape recorder or video camera and taping what was happening to us.


The next paragraph of the article is fairly correct.

"When people who believe such things reported them to the police, doctors or family, they said they were often told they were crazy. Sometimes they were medicated or locked in hospital wards, or fired from jobs and isolated from the outside world."


Just like with our cousins in the mobbing community. Before workplace mobbing was studied and verified, targets of this practice were often not believed, were often left isolated, and at times driven to suicide, or other acts of violence. Our communities experienced the same things, before these support apparatuses were put into place. Please keep in mind that Gang Stalking has a lot of the similarities to what happens with workplace mobbing, except this does happen in the community and we are followed around.


The next paragraph goes on to say.

"But when they found one another on the Internet, everything changed. So many others were having the same experiences."

This is in part true. Things did change once we started to compare notes, and provide a support structure for each other. Before this, many of us did suffer in silence and anguish. Since starting the Gang Stalking World website, I have had people tell me, that their families were falling apart, but after finding a support source, and just knowing that they were not alone, it made a world of difference. That is one of the primary and key functions that this website and others like it does.

The next paragraph goes onto say:

"Type “mind control” or “gang stalking” into Google, and Web sites appear that describe cases of persecution, both psychological and physical, related with the same minute details — red and white cars following victims, vandalism of their homes, snickering by those around them."


I will grant that many of our experiences do have extremely similar facets, much in the same way targets of bullying and mobbing had similar experiences. I am not sure that I would agree with the fact that we all see red and white cars. The cars that follow Targeted Individuals around come in all shapes and sizes, but in the past, several targets have noticed overt similarities.


The next paragraph describes us as an extreme community.


"Identified by some psychologists and psychiatrists as part of an “extreme community” on the Internet that appears to encourage delusional thinking, a growing number of such Web sites are filled with stories from people who say they are victims of mind control and stalking by gangs of government agents. The sites are drawing the concern of mental health professionals and the interest of researchers in psychology and psychiatry."


I find this paragraph to be interesting. I am not sure that sharing stories and providing support encourages delusional thinking anymore than sharing stories of workplace mobbing, did for the targets of that harassment, or what exposure did for the targets of Cointelpro. I think history has shown that gathering together and providing support and awareness has been beneficial for targets of similar forms of harassment.

If these mental health professionals are concerned about these websites spreading delusional thinking, I am wondering what they would have said and how they would have pronounced the mobbing websites just 10 to 15 years ago. At the time before serious research was paid to workplace mobbing, believing that your co-workers were conspiring to harass you out of the workplace, and that human resources was a part of this conspiracy in some cases would have been seen as delusional, but with the advent of research into workplace mobbing, we now see that this is in fact a very real phenomenon and human resources have not only been involved at times, but it's become a common practice in some areas with what's called the psychiatric reprisal.

http://www.harassment101.com/Article5.html

http://arts.uwaterloo.ca/~kwesthue/mobbing.htm
http://mobbing-usa.com/


What mobbing websites have done for targets of Workplace Mobbing in shedding light and offering assistance is what Gang Stalking websites are doing now for the targets of this practice.

When targets of the state in Russia were declared delusional and mentally ill, the psychiatric community in those countries were a very dedicated force in silencing those individuals and cooperating with the state. If researchers into psychology and psychiatry are interested in studying this phenomenon let's hope that it's with an eye towards finding out the truth, and not with the intention of helping the state to further persecute, which is what happened in Russia.

The next paragraph expresses the concern that social networking websites that deal with gang stalking, and mind control might inhibit targets from seeking help and impede treatment.


"Although many Internet groups that offer peer support are considered helpful to the mentally ill, some experts say Web sites that amplify reports of mind control and group stalking represent a dark side of social networking. They may reinforce the troubled thinking of the mentally ill and impede treatment."

What I have personally seen a lot of the Gloria Naylor types. By this I mean, people who sought out traditional forms of assistance. They went to the police, doctors, lawyers, had the mental exam, etc and they still were not getting anywhere, the problems were still happening in their lives. Gloria Naylor is a famous African American Author who was also a target of this practice. She wrote a book about her experiences title 1996. She first sought out psychological help and even went on medication which did not help. It was only after discovering websites that dealt with mind control, that she finally received some help and assistance. In her own words she has since then been able to start to turn her life around. Traditional forms of support in her case and many others have not helped, and have not lead those suffering to finding solutions that would help or assist them with functioning.

I would hope that if this is going to be studied, that cases such as Ramona Lopez and Jesus Mendoza will be reviewed. There cases are well documented and they were both whistle-blowers that started to experience the same phenomenon after blowing the whistle. I would also hope that if this is going to be researched, that they will review how writing the book into the Buzzsaw was able to provide help and support to journalist who go through a very similar phenomenon.

http://www.freedomofthepress.net/intothebuzzsaw.htm


Over the last two years, I find that many of the  people who are visiting my site, have sought out traditional assistance, and realise that something else is going on. They seek out additional assistance after realised that they are not getting help with what is happening to them. I see people who do start blogs or video tape what is happening to them, and they say that it provides them with a sense of empowerment. I can say on a personal level that exposure of what is happening to me, has been one of the most cathartic things that I was able to do over the last 2 years.


The next paragraph says that:


"Dr. Ralph Hoffman, a psychiatry professor at Yale who studies delusions, said a growing number of his research subjects have told him of visiting mind-control sites, and finding in them confirmation of their own experiences."

This tells me that more and more people are seeking out help and assistance on the Internet. What it does not tell me is what happens next? After they visit these sites, do they stop seeking Dr Hoffman assistance, do they just find some comfort in the fact that they are not alone, or some other alternative?

“The views of these belief systems are like a shark that has to be constantly fed,” Dr. Hoffman said. “If you don’t feed the delusion, sooner or later it will die out or diminish on its own accord. The key thing is that it needs to be repetitively reinforced.”

That is what the Web sites do, he said. Similar concerns have arisen about a proliferation of sites that describe how to commit suicide, or others that promote anorexia and bulimia, providing detailed instructions on restricting food and photographs of skeletal women meant to be “thinspiration.”

With all due respect to Dr Hoffman, many of the people that I have spoken to, again had sought out traditional assistance and it was not working. They had tried to believe that things were maybe in their heads, but found consistent reasons to believe otherwise and went seeking out other answers. These are the majority of people that are ending up at my website. The same way many targets of mobbing end up at workplace mobbing and bullying websites, when first trying to understand their harassment and bullying.

Gang Stalking websites in many cases are not feeding a delusion anymore than mobbing or bullying websites are. They are giving targets similar stories, or a list of symptoms that are the same or similar to their own. They are helping them to find solace and often answers that had hither to alluded them. They also provide comfort and support.

The comparison of Gang Stalking websites to sites that encourage people to commit suicide, or revel in their eating disorders is an unfair, and unjust comparison. We in fact do the opposite. Gang Stalking websites, based on feedback that I have received, often help people out of some of the darker moments that they are going through. We strive in fact to stop people from committing suicide or other acts of violence. Knowledge is power, and we provide them with up to date information based on research, that many in the Gang Stalking community have been doing.

Before Gang Stalking websites were available, some people like myself used mobbing and bullying websites for support, but that did not quite answer all the questions or cover all the scenarios of what was happening to us. If visiting these mobbing and bullying sites were not harmful, then might it be supposed that visiting Gang Stalking websites could be having a similar and beneficial effect for individuals who feel that they are targets of this practice?


"There is no concise survey of mind-control sites or others describing gang stalking — whose users believe that groups of people are following and controlling them, as part of a test of neurological or other kinds of weapons likely conducted by the government — on the Net. But they are easy to find. Some have hundreds of postings, along with links to dozers of similar sties. One, Gangstalkingworld.com, welcomes visitors with this description: “Gang Stalking is a systemic form of control, which seeks to destroy every aspect of a Targeted Individual’s life. The target is followed around and placed under surveillance by Civilian Spies/Snitches 24/7.”

I am really glad to see that the article was kind enough to mention the Gang Stalking World website. I just wish that it had also mentioned that a program called Cointelpro was perpetrated by the American government and has very similar characteristics to what we describe as Gang Stalking. I wish the article had also mentioned that Cynthia McKinney,a former United States Representative had also requested to have Cointelpro investigations re-opened, because she believed that aspects of this were still ongoing.

http://www.cynthiaforcongress.com/bio.php


"the sites provide the powerful, unfamiliar experience of being understood by others."

I think this paragraph more than anything else sums this up really well. These websites provide understanding. I can remember personally reading Mark M. Rich's the hidden evil for the first time, and I remember somewhere on his old site where it said you are not alone. After that I never felt alone again. There is something about connecting with others who are having a shared experience that is so cathartic, and amazing. You truly do not feel alone and for the first time I was able to connect with this stranger that was miles away, and feel truly understood. In the subsequent years, this is the feedback that I have received from the dozens of website visitors who have come through my site.
http://www.gangstalkingworld.com/Handbook/TheHiddenEvil.pdf




“By and large, most people are sane and coherent and can relate exactly what’s happening to them,” Mr. Robinson said. “They can say the things that would otherwise get them labeled as delusional.”


People for the first time in years are free to be themselves and to say what they want to say, without someone saying that they are crazy. This is not only one of the amazing things about the Gang Stalking Support sites, but this is one of the amazing things about the Internet, and this is the concept that has helped the Internet to grow and to become what it is.

"Vaughan Bell, a British psychologist who has researched the effect of the Internet on mental illness, first began tracking sites with reports of mind control in 2004. In 2006 he published a study concluding that there was an extensive Internet community around such beliefs, and he called 10 sites he studied “likely psychotic sites.”

The extent of the community, Dr. Bell said, poses a paradox to the traditional way delusion is defined under the diagnostic guidelines of the American Psychiatric Association, which says that if a belief is held by a person’s “culture or subculture,” it is not a delusion. The exception accounts for rituals of religious faith, for example."

Since Gang Stalking World only began in 2006, and we don't predominantly deal with the mind control aspect of the targeting, I can assume that my website is not on the list that Dr Bell put together. I would however love to have a copy of this list, because even within the Gang Stalking, Mind Control communities, there are websites that are more  helpful and useful than others. Before passing further judgement, I would love to see the 10 websites that he used when making his assessment.


"Dr. Bell, whose study was published in the journal Psychopathology, said that it does not suggest all people participating in mind-control sites are delusional, and that a firm diagnosis of psychosis could only be done in person."

Since diagnosis has to be done in person to formulate an accurate opinion about wither a person is delusional or suffering from a psychosis, I am a bit surprised that a remote assessment was made in regards to a whole community, but I again would love to read the research first.


"For people who say they are the target of mind control or gang stalking, there may be enough evidence in the scientific literature to fan their beliefs. Many sites point to MK-ULTRA, the code name for a covert C.I.A. mind-control and chemical interrogation program begun in the 1950s.

Recently the sites have linked to an article published in September in Time magazine, “The Army’s Totally Serious Mind-Control Project,” which described a $4 million contract given to the Army to develop “thought helmets” that would allow troops to communicate through brain waves on the battlefield."

I wish the article had pointed to the even more numerous articles on some of these websites in regards to proof that people are being followed around, and placed under watch.


The next paragraph points to Jim Guest a Republican State Representative, who just like Cynthia McKinney has also taken some of our claims seriously.


"And the users of some sites have found the support of Jim Guest, a Republican state representative in Missouri, who wrote last year to his fellow legislators calling for an investigation into the claims of those who say they are being tortured by mind control.

“I’ve had enough calls, some from credible people — professors — being targeted by nonlethal weapons,” Mr. Guest said in a telephone interview, adding that nothing came of his request for a legislative investigation. “They become psychologically affected by it. They have trouble sleeping at night.”

He added: “I believe there are people who have been targeted by this. With this equipment, you have to test it on somebody to see if it works.”

The article might have also mentioned that three states have now passed laws in regards to electronic harassment. In the last several years there has been forward momentum, because there has been a focus on exposure and awareness.


"Dr. Bell and some other mental health professionals say that even if the users of such sites are psychotic, forging an online connection to others and being told — perhaps for the first time — “you are not crazy” could actually have a positive effect on their illnesses.

“We know, for example, that things like social support, all of these positive social aspects are very good for people’s mental illness,” Dr. Bell said. “I wouldn’t say it’s entirely and completely positive, but it can be positive.”

Some research has shown that when people with delusions undergo group cognitive therapy, the group process can be helpful in their treatment

But the Web sites are not moderated by professionals, and many postings discuss the failure of medication and say that mental health professionals are part of the conspiracy against them."

Tim Fields when he set up his Bully support website was not a professional either. He in fact was a target of bullying. He was later accredited for his work in the field, because of the research that he did. He also started to find a link to suggest there was a conspiracy afoot with what was happening to many targets of bullying when they sought out help and assistance.

It's still unfortunate that with full knowledge of programs such as Cointelpro, MK-Ultra, and the situation in the former East Germany that some mental health professionals would conclude an assessment of mental illness before proper research into this phenomenon was thoroughly conducted.

http://www.bullyonline.org/action/obstruct.htm


Again the above paragraph goes to show that people finding our websites, are trying out traditional forms of support, medication and psychological assistance which are not working, and they are seeking further assistance and locating our websites. Again I will point out that with the situation in Russia that happened, the mental health profession was a part of the conspiracy. We see similar patterns with McCarthyism and Cointelpro and organisations that should be trustworthy being parts of government conspiracies.


"“These people lead quietly desperate lives,” said Dr. Jeffrey A. Lieberman, chairman of the Department of Psychiatry at Columbia University. “And if they are reinforcing each other and pulling people toward something, if they are using the Internet and getting reinforcement, that’s good.”"

I don't know that all targets lead desperate lives, however being a target of Gang Stalking and or Mind Control can have a stressful effect like none other. We are using the Internet to find support, encouragement and understanding, which is something that many of us we were not able to do before.


"Psychiatrists and researchers say it is too soon to say whether communication on the Internet among people who may be psychotic will negatively effect their illnesses.” This is a very complex little corner,” said Dr. Ken Duckworth, the medical director for the National Alliance on Mental Illness, an advocacy group. “Some people may find it’s healing, but these are really hard questions. The Internet isn’t a cause of mental illness, it’s a complicating new variable.”

Because being psychotic can and should be primarily assessed in person, I am still wondering where the conclusion is being drawn that the people frequenting these websites have a mental illness is to begin with? I can understand if this assessment is being based on people who have first visited traditional psychiatrist, but then this would also show that traditional forms of theory might not be helping and that people are still seeking out additional support. Ether way I found the article to be a fascinating read, and I am glad to add it to the collection of articles that have been acquired over the last two years, in trying to get to the heart of what has been happening to members of the Gang Stalking community.

With any support system, there will be good and bad. I would suggest that people still have more than one mechanism in place, but overall, no matter what you are going through, finding love support and understanding is a good thing.
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: Nov 17th, 2008, 2:01am by Gangstalking »  

United we stand. Divided they fall.
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Gangstalking
Administrator
*****


Happy New Year

Posts: 4175
Re: Sharing their Conspiracy on the Internet
Reply #1 - Nov 16th, 2008, 6:40am
 
Will this article be a help or a hinderacnce? First I want to thank the person who dropped it off. I appriciate it.
 
For those who have been around for some time, you might have seen articles such as the Sharon Weinberger article come and go. She wrote the article Mind Games, which I will say in my opinion was not a favorable article for the Targeted Individual community. That article did recieve a rebuttal from myself, and some others, but our rebuttals were never reprinted.  
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR2007011001399. html
 
Well along comes this new Article by Sarah Kershaw and it's hard to know what to make of the article. I think it's far more balanced than the Wineberger article, and It's nice to see Derrick get some press, but it would have been nice to know that the article was going to come out a few days ago. Things like that are always very helpful.  
 
I think the article will depend on how people interpret it and relate to it. As you may be aware, part of my recent focus was going to be on getting Gang Stalking further normalized in society.  Well we have Gang Stalking more exposed in society, but what we do not need and do not want is to have the term Gang Stalking normalized as a dulusion and our support sites as a support site for dulusional people. I find that it's fascinating that those in the psychiatric community are keeping a close watch on these websites. I guess they are having even more of an effect than realised. However with the research that has been uncovered this can be a good thing or a bad thing.  
 
We have seen in the case of Kilmeer Gill where the goth community were targeted after his shooting spree, though Kilveer was a member of several websites inclusing Myspace, they used his actions to deliveratly go after the goth community. Vampire Freekes were a close knit enough group that they were able to recover and heal from the attack, but it's something to be cognizant of.  
 
In the comming days it will be interesting to monitor the reaction from within and more importantly from outside of the community. Will people finally become more aware of what is happening in society, be more willing to openly discuss it, or will they try to use the article as a means to confirm the so called dulusional state of the Gang Stalking Community?
 
I am hoping for the best, however no matter what happens with this article, our activism based on awareness and exposure must continue. It's another day just like any others, and we have to continue to make sure that what is happening to us is in the spotlight and that awareness grows outwards from a ground level onwards.  
 
If you have not had a chance to read the article, please take a moment to read it now.
Back to top
 
 

United we stand. Divided they fall.
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Gangstalking
Administrator
*****


Happy New Year

Posts: 4175
Re: Sharing their Conspiracy on the Internet
Reply #2 - Nov 16th, 2008, 9:14am
 
http://egelwan.wordpress.com/2008/11/13/sharing-their-demons-on-the-web/#comment -68
 
Some feedback from someone who deals with patiences that are being targeted in this way.
Back to top
 
 

United we stand. Divided they fall.
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Gangstalking
Administrator
*****


Happy New Year

Posts: 4175
Re: Sharing their Conspiracy on the Internet
Reply #3 - Nov 16th, 2008, 10:38am
 
So a quick trip around the Internet tell me this. Those who understood about government experiments seem to get it, and this article seems to be going into the conspiracy files or government propaganda files.  
 
Other locations that did not get it before, still do not get it now. This article if it's generated any discussion has people debating on wither people and their dulusions are helped by websites such as these.  
 
You still have the basic human factor of ingrained beliefs to overcome. Interesting, I hope to gather more feedback regarding this in the next few days. Well does this help my progress for getting gang stalking normalized in society? So far it does if I wanted the term to be synonomous with delusional thinking, but I think in time people with a few more articles might start to understand that there is more ongoing, which is ofcouse what would not be desired by some.  
 
I think this is an overall interesting development.
Back to top
 
 

United we stand. Divided they fall.
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Gangstalking
Administrator
*****


Happy New Year

Posts: 4175
Re: Sharing their Conspiracy on the Internet
Reply #4 - Nov 17th, 2008, 3:00am
 
http://tiworld.blogspot.com/2008/11/onto-activism.html
 
Regarding his interview with Sarah Kershaw. Please keep in mind that even thought Gang Stalking World was mentioned in the article, no one from this website was interviewed for the artcile.  
 
I have spoken to Derrick Robinson of FFCH and he was interviewed for this article, and so was AJH from TI World.
Back to top
 
 

United we stand. Divided they fall.
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Gangstalking
Administrator
*****


Happy New Year

Posts: 4175
Re: Sharing their Conspiracy on the Internet
Reply #5 - Nov 17th, 2008, 3:37am
 
http://arginine.spc.org/vaughan/Bell_2007_JMH_Preprint.pdf
 
The report by Vaughan Bell. I don't have time to break it down now, but there are some interesting points that I would like to touch upon. You can in the mean time read the report if you wish. It is also not fully clearhow he is drawing his definition of Extreame Communities, but based on this brief description  
 
Quote:

Extreme communities
One feature that has garnered relatively little attention in the clinical research literature is the
existence of what might be termed ‘extreme communities’. Owing to the difficulty with which
material can be effectively censored or suppressed online, views considered extreme or
unacceptable to the mainstream can be expressed relatively freely, with online communities often
formed by those who share similar opinions. Some of these are of particular interest to mental
health professionals, as they attempt to reframe what would otherwise be classified as ‘mental
disorder’ in an entirely different light.

 
Views considered extreame or unacceptable by the mainstream. So I guess 9/11 truth movement would be an extreame community, because the views are considered extreame by the mainstream. Who else would fall into this list, based on this definition. I mean most of the topics covered at sites like Above Top Secret would fall into this category. They would be a website of mini patches of extreame communities. Same with other conspiracy websites. If that is the definiation that we are going to use and base this on. Is there more to the definition?
 
Back to top
 
 

United we stand. Divided they fall.
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Gangstalking
Administrator
*****


Happy New Year

Posts: 4175
Re: Sharing their Conspiracy on the Internet
Reply #6 - Nov 17th, 2008, 3:55am
 
Quote:

I am doing a preliminary search to see what I can find out about extreme communities. Though I know what Dr Bell is referencing to, the term is not one that I have come across before, and a quick scan of the Internet shows that this might be a little buzz word that he dreamed up himself. At this moment I have not been able to find any clear definitions of an extreame community, but based on his standards an definition in the article, as long as it "views considered extreme or unacceptable to the mainstream"

Would the Storm Front Community be on this list? I mean their views are not considered main stream or are they? This definition as is, is so broad, I could drive a 747 into it and still miss. There are lot's of groups on the Internet that do not conform to or who have what would be considered extreme or unacceptable views to the mainstream world, but you then have to look at other factors.

Are they harmful or helpful? What kind of purpose do they serve? See if you go to a website that has an extreme view that tells you to kill yourself, should that not be considered different than going to a website that expounds none traditional views, but steers the website viewer away from inflicting harm to themselves? There are lot's of websites that conform to traditional or more traditional main stream views that in my opinion are probably fairly harmful to some aspects of society, but we turn a blind eye, because it does pass mainstream muster.

The definition as is, that I could find is too broad, and so far is limited to references to the Vaughn Bell article and then the subsequent reference found in the New York Times article.

I think before a community is labeled, you should have a more clear defined definition, amongst other things.
Back to top
 
 

United we stand. Divided they fall.
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Gangstalking
Administrator
*****


Happy New Year

Posts: 4175
Re: Sharing their Conspiracy on the Internet
Reply #7 - Nov 19th, 2008, 10:16pm
 
As many know, I have been tracking the New York Times article to see what kind of reaction it's getting across the board.  
 
It's gotten a lot of various reactions. I have come across people who now say that it's trendy to think that you are being followed around. Gang Stalking trendy? I don't know about that one.  
 
We have people who think that we are paranoids getting together and sharing stories, but getting the help we need and that's a good thing. I didn't stop to find out if the person was Martha Steward or not, but apparently it's a good thing. LOL.  
 
I came across one person who is researching the Jeremy Blake and Teresa Duncan suicides, or what they termed Gang Stalking by Scientology, and this person was a little bit concerned for their own well being after starting this research. I mean a general research is one thing, but any time you did deep like Gary Webb did, you do have to be careful.  
 
I have had to join Digg, Reddit, Slashdot, and so many other places to track this article down, and the reaction to it. Cause it's nice to know the pulse of the Internet.  
 
So Gang Stalking has become a household name. Which is good. It's not in the way we wanted it, in many cases, but the term is out there and that was a goal. Everyone has to start someplace. I see this like starting in the mail room. We have our foot in the door, it's our choice what we make of it.  
 
We still have a lot of people who read the article, did not go and visit any of the websites mentioned, and formulated an opinion strictly based on the article. I found at least one person who tried to check out the website, but who said it was down. I know my website shows 100% up time over the last few weeks, so I suggested he try again.  
 
My email is not working properly so if you do email me, and don't get me, please use the Wordpress blog to try for access. It's just within the last 72 hours that it's not working correctly. Email is either not arriving, or it's being delayed for several hours.  
 
 
Also in tracking the article, I found a copy of it at this forum. I wanted to be able to respond to the article, because as you know, I have written a response. http://forum.psychlinks.ca/showthread.php?p=103474
 
 
I used the user name gangstalking, because it's what I use all over the Internet, when speaking out about what is happening. Have a cause, use the name that goes with the cause, just common sense. Well after waiting to be approved. (We are not worthy, we are not worthy. Sorry flash back to Wayne's World the movie.)
 
Anyways, I received this response.  
 
 
 
 
Quote:
"Given the sensitive nature of the Psychlinks Forum, your chosen username, "gangstalking", is likely to be a trigger for certain members.

I have deleted this account. Feel free to re-register with a less triggering username.

Dr. David J. Baxter, C.Psych."

 
 
So I wrote to him to find out what kind of trigger this was likely to be? It has not been a trigger for anyone over the last two years, but suddenly, it's going to be a trigger, because you are going to make it so perhaps?
 
So I wrote back to find out what kind of a trigger this was going to be? It seem a little neurotic to me. See my feedback below.  
 
Quote:
"I registered the user name gangstalking, because you had an article on this forum that I wanted to comment on.

I was told that I could not use the user name gangstalking, because it might be a trigger word. I am wondering what type of pre-conseived notions this forum has regarding the user name gangstalking.

http://forum.psychlinks.ca/index.php
show details 8:39 AM (12 hours ago)"

 
 
Apparently it takes a long time to be approved for this forum. 12 hours ago. I really do think people create neurosis themselves, at times. Anyways he writes back.  
 
Quote:

We have members who have experienced a variety of trauma, including sexual assaults and ex-partner stalking and violence. You need to understand and be sensitive to these issues if you are going to be a member of this community.That is a very strict forum policy.

On your second registration, I changed your username to GS when I approved it.

Dr. David J. Baxter, C.Psych.


 
 
Ok I can understand his surface concern, but remember associating with people who have been through these types of situations is not new for me or different. In the last two years, I have encountered and associated with a variety of people. So I wrote back.  
 
Quote:
So Dr Baxter, to understand you correctly. Even though I have used the user name on the Sexual Harassment Support forum, the Stalking Victims Sanctuary forum, and several other related forums of that type, you now feel that it would be insensitive to use this user name on your forum.

I am well aware of the sensitivity of these issues, having championed and dealth with these issues on a peer to peer support basis. I have conversed with several of these other support sites, and they did not come to the same conclusions that you have, thus I am trying to understand what is behind this concern with the user name.

I respect your forum guidelines, I however am still not clear why you personally feel that the user name will have a negative effect on your members, when it has not on other forums thus mentioned. I am just trying to understand what is at the heart of this matter.

Regards,

gangstalking.

 
At this stage I am going to trust that Dr Baxter understands his community better than I do, and they may be more sensitive than other communities of a similar nature, and so I am going to decline to be a part of his community, because if my user name would offend, then what might my commenting do? Since the term Gang Stalking is likely to come up? Also if the term is so offensive that I can't use the user name, then why have an article with this on your forum?
 
http://forum.psychlinks.ca/showthread.php?p=103474
 
I don't want to be mean, but I am thinking that there are people coming across this article on that forum, seeing the name and wigging out. Either way, so that I don't risk offending, I am going to refrain from posting on this forum and responding to the article.  
 
I really wanted to respond to the article, as I have on several other Internet websites, to help facilitate a better understanding of our community and what we are about and why we felt some portions of the New York Times article were unbalanced, but I feel at this stage, anything I write there, might be construed as harmful to the members. So out of respect for that, I will refrain from posting my article response, which many of you have now seen.  
 
http://www.gangstalkingworld.com/Social/article.php?sid=315&mode=thread& order=0
 
For better or for worst the term Gang Stalking is now a household name, offline and online. The question now is how do we as a community help facilitate further understanding and awareness to the general public, who still get their information from the mainstream media, in many cases without any relevant  questions being asked?
 
Back to top
 
 

United we stand. Divided they fall.
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Gangstalking
Administrator
*****


Happy New Year

Posts: 4175
Re: Sharing their Conspiracy on the Internet
Reply #8 - Nov 21st, 2008, 11:08am
 
Quote:

Just a quick update on the New York Times article.

I have just spoken to Vaughan Bell, one of the key psychologists mentioned in the article and he was kind enough to clarify that he has never studied Gang Stalking.

The research that he did, fully focuses on Mind Control sites. He has never studied Gang Stalking or the Gang Stalking World website more specifically.

I think one of the things that Sarah Kershaw did in the article, that many people do is that she lumped in Gang Stalking, Electronic Harassment, and Mind Control, all together.

For the record I do believe that all three happen and are happening to Targets. I know about Mk Ultra, the experiments that happened, the law-suites for mind control. I am familiar with Electronic Harassment. How many times have I gone into the shower to have patches of my skin peal off from the burns of the night before?

I do however focus on the Gang Stalking aspect of it, because it comes down to what can you prove? Over the last two years, I have spoken to enough police officers, (who are no longer mentioned), health professional, social workers, crisis centers, lawyers, Investigators, Human Rights, etc to find out what I could about what was happening with the Citizen Informants, and the programs that are being used for.

I have enough people offline and online that I have spoken to, to know that I know what I am talking about with the Gang Stalking stuff.


Since the only psychologist thus far that I could find who mentioned extreme communities was again Vaughan Bell, he has not identified the Gang Stalking websites as such, since he has never studied them.

The article also does make it clear that in relationship to Dr. Ralph Hoffman, his patients have "told him of visiting mind-control sites, and finding in them confirmation of their own experiences."

So we have two named professionals, one psychiatrist and one psychologist, both who have not it would appear studied, or actually made mention of the Gang Stalking Websites.

It seems the confusion and the lumping together of the terms might be coming from the author of the article Sarah Kershaw, and it is an easy error to make, if you are not familiar with the three phenomenons. We are all Targeted Individuals, but just because you experience or are a target of one, does not mean that you are a target of all.

I just wanted to clarify this factor for anyone who still had questions about this article or how the conclusions came about. I might do a bit more follow up, on this article with at least one more person, but these are important details that I thought should be clearifed.
Back to top
 
 

United we stand. Divided they fall.
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Gangstalking
Administrator
*****


Happy New Year

Posts: 4175
Re: Sharing their Conspiracy on the Internet
Reply #9 - Nov 30th, 2008, 3:51am
 
Here are the follow up articles on this topic.  
 
 
1. Sharing their Conspiracy on the Internet
 
 
http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2008/11/16/sharing-their-conspiracy-on-the-int ernet/
 
 
2. Bridging the gap.
 
http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2008/11/17/bridging-the-gap/
 
 
3. Extreme assessments and paranoid conclusions
 
http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/extreme-assessments-and-paranoid-co nclusions/
 
4. Clarification
 
http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2008/11/21/clarification/
 
 
5. Areas to consider when researching Gang Stalking
 
http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2008/11/22/gang-stalking-research/
Back to top
 
 

United we stand. Divided they fall.
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print