Welcome, Guest. Please Login.

Gang Stalking World

Feb 8th, 2010, 11:31pm
News:
Home Help Search Login


Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
SNITCH CULTURE & Buzzsaw. Must read articles. (Read 390 times)
Gangstalking
Administrator
*****


Happy New Year

Posts: 2925
SNITCH CULTURE & Buzzsaw. Must read articles.
Dec 25th, 2008, 5:41pm
 
Quote:

http://www.wingtv.net/snitch.html

Researched and written by award-winning reporter Jim Redden, SNITCH CULTURE reveals how politicians, law enforcement agencies, private corporations, politically-oriented non-profit organizations, and the establishment media are working together to build the most sophisticated surveillance society in history. SNITCH CULTURE traces the creation of this intelligence-gathering network from the earliest paid informants to todayıs DNA databases and beyond.

SNITCH CULTURE covers such important developments as the Red Scare, the Federal Bureau of Investigationıs infamous Counter-Intelligence Programs (COINTELPRO), the National Security Agencyıs high-tech ECHELON surveillance system, and Project Megiddo, which incorrectly predicted a wave of domestic terrorism at the beginning of the year 2000. The 235-page book also includes a look at the governmentıs newest intelligence initiative - the war against the emerging anti-globalization movement.

Jim Redden is a professional journalist who has written for such diverse publications as the Village Voice and Hustler. He has written about anarchists, militias, skinheads and radical AIDS activists. Redden is currently the Senior Staff Writer for the Portland Tribune newspaper in Portland, Oregon. He can be reached at pdxs@teleport.com.

SNITCH CULTURE

HOW CITIZENS ARE TURNED INTO THE EYES AND EARS OF THE STATE

INTRODUCTION

LIVING IN THE SURVEILLANCE SOCIETY

As American enters the New Millennium, this country is in the grip of a government-created surveillance system which permeates every aspect of our lives. The economy is booming and things couldnıt be better for the vast majority of citizens. Serious crime is at a 30-year low, with murder and other violent felonies dropping in every region of the nation. Minorities are earning more than ever before, and the schools have never been safer. And yet, despite this good news, large segments of the population live in fear - a fear created and exploited by opportunistic politicians and power-hungry law enforcement officials to justify the most sophisticated police state ever created.

And at the heart of this nightmare is the snitch, the government's weapon of choice against criminals and law-abiding citizens alike. People gather incriminating information on us even before weıre born. Pregnant women are routinely tested to see if theyıve exposed their fetuses to alcohol or illegal drugs, with doctors reporting "drug affected" babies to social service and law enforcement agencies.

If we enroll in the public schools, we are spied on by other students, our teachers, and our counselors. Many schools provide anonymous telephone tip lines for students to squeal on their classmates. A growing number of school administrators are paying for incriminating information. Teachers and counselors are encouraged to report students with "anti-social tendencies" to the police. Reports of typical juvenile schoolyard behavior now result in suspensions, expulsions and arrests.

College campuses are riddled with informants. Politically active teachers are monitored by students who oppose their views. Student political organizations are infiltrated by undercover operatives gathering information on controversial campus speakers and upcoming demonstrations. Foreign students are targeted for surveillance, especially Muslims of Arab ethnicity.

Informants track us after we graduate and enter the workforce. Many potential employers run background checks on job applicants, asking friends and neighbors about their private lives. Some bosses hire undercover agents who pose as workers and spy on everyone in the company, reporting on everything from suspected thieves to employees with poor morale. If we own a business, the government might send over fake customers to see if they can trick us into breaking civil rights laws. These so-called "testers" report our reactions to federal officials who can assess fines or even throw us in jail.

Our neighbors are encouraged to spy on us. If our children cry, they report us to social workers for abuse. If we have a large number of visitors, they call the police and accuse us of dealing drugs. If we drive a new car, they call the Internal Revenue Service and say we're not paying our taxes.

Family members routinely turn each other in to the police, especially for illegal drug use. Encouraged by government snitch programs, children rat on their parents, parents squeal on their kids, and children report their siblings to the authorities. Wives and husbands turn on each other in divorce proceedings, triggering criminal investigations by accusing their former mates of everything from domestic violence to child abuse to hiding their assets.

Unconventional political and religious movements are also infiltrated by snitches. Law enforcement agencies and private, politically-oriented advocacy groups spy on liberal and conservative organizations alike, along with tiny churches and obscure religious sects. No group is too small or inconsequential to escape the prying eye of the government or its agents.

Discussions with doctors and lawyers are no longer confidential. Government regulations require doctors to report patients with HIV and other contagious diseases to health authorities. Medicare recipients who suspect their doctors are padding their bills are encouraged to report them to Washington bureaucrats. Lawyers have gone to jail for not telling the feds which clients are paying with cash.

The intrusions don't even stop when we die. Government agencies routinely ask doctors if drugs, both legal and illegal, contributed to the death. Physicians must report whether their deceased patients smoked cigarettes or drank alcohol. Passengers who die in car crashes are tested for alcohol, with the results transmitted to transportation officials for their reports on alcohol-related traffic fatalities. Police use the results of such tests to justify their own brutality, arguing that unarmed people they kill were drunk or stoned.

Obeying the law is no protection against informants. Snitches frequently set people up, tricking them into breaking the law. Or they simply lie, making up stories and swearing to events that never happened. Criminals routinely perjure themselves in exchange for special treatment, sending innocent people to jail and even Death Row. Many people have lost their jobs, been thrown out of their homes, gone to jail - even lost their lives - because of lies told by informants.

We're so used to being tracked that we donıt even notice how often we're being urged to report our friends, neighbors, family members and complete strangers to the authorities. A billboard in Harlem asks citizens to join "Gunbusters Anonymous" and report "illegal guns" to the New York Police Department. Neighborhood "crime watch" programs send thousands of people into the streets every night to look for "suspicious activity." Newspapers across the country publish weekly "Crime Stopper" stories, running descriptions and photographs of people wanted by law enforcement authorities. Public service announcements on late night television urge neighbors to "take a bite out of crime" by watching each other. Police officers visit the public schools, telling children to report their friends and parents for suspected drug use. Wanted posters in post officers are so common we look right past them.

Snitching has become entertainment, a growing staple of network and cable TV channels. America's Most Wanted serves up a half-dozen new suspects every week, using hokey crime re-creations to make us pick up the phone and report anyone who even resembles the actors and actress parading across the screen. Tabloid programs such as The Jerry Springer Show use informants to shame their guests, exposing hidden love affairs and embarrassing personal faults for our amusement. Cheating husbands and two-timing wives are physically attacked on stage when their darkest secrets are revealed by vengeful ex-lovers, the studio audience roaring its approval like the Coliseum crowds of ancient Rome.

More recently, "reality-based" TV shows such as Survivor and Big Brother offer up round-the-clock surveillance for our amusement. The constant monitoring is said to reveal the true character of the people in stressful situation. Viewers vote on who they donıt like, punishing unpopular participants with digital banishment.

But the modern surveillance society is not a passing form of entertainment. And its consequences are far more severe than any passing humiliation. Our most personal information is now being fed directly into a massive system of interlocking computer databases maintained by government agencies, law enforcement officials, for-profit businesses and private intelligence networks. Our school, employment, medical, psychiatric, banking, credit, automobile, housing, TV viewing, computer use and gun ownership records are all stored electronically by people weıve never met, accessible at the stroke of a computer key.

And now the government is adding our DNA, the unique genetic code found in our every cell, to their files. All 50 states have laws requiring that DNA samples be taken from convicted criminals and sent to the National Offender Database maintained by the FBI. By May 2000, about 280,000 samples had been placed online and another 750,000 were still waiting to be processed. Some politicians are already pushing for DNA samples to be taken from anyone merely arrested for a crime. How long will it be before everyoneıs DNA is simply tested at birth? And what will happen if a lab researcher tells the government our genes say we're bad?

Such tips can trigger a broad range of responses by federal, state and local authorities, from home visits by child care and mental health specialists to deadly raids by heavily-armed SWAT units. Governments have spent billions of dollars in recent years militarizing local police departments across the country, and creating special federal units with overwhelming firepower. They are all ready and waiting for an informant to send them on their next mission. The result of all this snitching has been boiled down to a simple bumpersticker that can be seen on cars and trucks in all 50 state: "I love my country, but fear my government."

The Snitch Culture did not come about by accident. It was deliberately created by Democrats and Republicans alike, working with federal, state and local law enforcement officials to build a nationwide intelligence-gathering network which is impossible to escape. This surveillance system did not spring to life overnight. It was assembled in pieces over the past century in reaction to one manufactured threat to the American way of life after another, each requiring new laws, new law enforcement agencies, and new informants to enforce. Our political and law enforcement leaders repeatedly seize on bizarre but isolated incidents to create the image of a country under attack from all sides. The threats have ranged over the years from anarchists to marijuana to Communists to heroin to Muslims to methamphetamine to white supremacists, but in each case the governmentıs response has been the same - a new domestic war. The War on Crime. The War on Drugs. The War on Terrorism. The War on Youth Violence.

The establishment press plays along with the charade, creating a parallel universe where death and destruction waits around every corner. With the advent of satellite trucks and 24-hour news channels, the result is a constant media bombardment of ever greater dangers, all requiring us to spy on our neighbors, friends and family members.

President Bill Clinton exploited the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing to channel hundreds of millions of dollars to the Federal Bureau of Investigation to greatly expand its domestic political surveillance programs. The FBI opened a new counter-terrorism center and established a series of multi-jurisdictional task forces, working with state and local authorities to gather intelligence on suspected dissidents in their regions. The far right neo-Patriot movement was the original target but, by the end of the decade, the government had shifted its focus to the left-leaning anti-globalization movement that debuted at the World Trade Organization meeting in Seattle.

The Columbine High School massacre became an excuse for Americaıs public school students, teachers, counselors and administrators to turn on any child who didn't fit in. Within hours of the shootings, the press was running in-depth reports about homicidal teenagers raised on a corrosive diet of morbid goth music, violent video games and blood-drenched movies - an entire generation of young people with no regard for human life. Clinton went on national television and urged students across the country to report any classmates who seemed anti-social. Hundreds if not thousands of students were suspended, expelled and even arrested for typical adolescent behavior, or for bringing something as innocuous as nail clippers to class.

The message is clear: Americans must spy on each other, reporting all signs of suspicious activity or aberrant behavior to the authorities. And if the people won't tattle, the government will monitor their every waking moment anyway. Video cameras line the freeways. Bank transactions are monitored. Even our computers are being used against us, collecting and sending personal information through private companies to federal law enforcement agencies.

The ultimate symbol of this power is Echelon, a massive system of space age listening devices and supercomputers maintained by the U.S. governmentıs top secret National Security Agency. Created over the course of the Cold War, Echelon is an information vacuum cleaner which can monitor virtually every phone call, e-mail, fax, radio transmission, television broadcast, and other form of electronic communication in the world today. Legal concepts such as the right to privacy are a joke to this computer-driving monitoring system which can eavesdrop on practically everyone at the same time.

The result is a society driven by manufactured mass paranoia, where personal betrayal is seen as a virtue instead of the lowest form of human behavior. And as the 21st Century begins to unfold, this perverse version of reality is being exported around the world. Seamless global surveillance is the ultimate goal. All it takes is a tip from a snitch to make you a target.
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: Apr 13th, 2009, 11:08am by Gangstalking »  

United we stand. Divided they fall.
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Gangstalking
Administrator
*****


Happy New Year

Posts: 2925
Re: SNITCH CULTURE. (This is a must read article)
Reply #1 - Dec 25th, 2008, 5:46pm
 
Not only does this article summerize all that I have been seeing, but also just about everything that I have been trying to convey to you for the last two years. We have paid snitches being used, and then we have a society that has been turned into a snitch culture. It's creepy and crazy, but there it is. Then look at the last line, "All it takes is the word of a snitch to make you a target."
 
How many of us knew that a few years back? See you don't have to do anything in society to be targeted and from there, only God knows. This article could not have come at a better time. I will also repost the link to snitch culture which is now available at Amazon.com
 
The book came out almost a decade ago, so if things were that far gone when the book was written, can you imagine how bad they are now? Well you can because we are targets of this. If you are a real target then this is what we are looking at, and this is the information that the public needs to see, hear and understand.  
 
This review of the book is really the best present, cause it can really help others to understand how we are a society of Informants and how this could be so widespead.  
 
Back to top
 
 

United we stand. Divided they fall.
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Gangstalking
Administrator
*****


Happy New Year

Posts: 2925
Re: SNITCH CULTURE. (This is a must read article)
Reply #2 - Dec 25th, 2008, 5:47pm
 
http://www.amazon.com/Snitch-Culture-Citizens-Turned-State/dp/0922915636
 
Snitch Culture: How Citizens are Turned into the Eyes and Ears of the State
Back to top
 
 

United we stand. Divided they fall.
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Gangstalking
Administrator
*****


Happy New Year

Posts: 2925
Into the Buzzsaw
Reply #3 - Apr 13th, 2009, 11:06am
 
Quote from Gangstalking on Feb 3rd, 2008, 10:43pm:
Into The Buzzsaw: 18 Tales Of Media Censorship


by Michelle Goldberg



Audio: Kristina Borjesson interview
(Interview starts just after 1:00:00, after the 1st hour)



Quote:
Between them, the authors of the incendiary new book "Into the Buzzsaw," out this month from Prometheus, have won nearly every award journalism has to give -- a Pulitzer, several Emmys, a Peabody, a prize from Investigative Reporters and Editor, an Edward R. Murrorw and several accolades from the Society of Professional Journalists. One is veteran of the Drug Enforcement Administration and a best-selling author, another is a Nieman Fellow at Harvard.

And most of them are considered, at best, marginal by the mainstream media. At worst, they've been deemed incompetent and crazy for having the audacity to uncover evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors committed by government agencies and corporate octopi.

Edited by ex-CBS producer Kristina Borjesson, "Into the Buzzsaw" is a collection of essays, mostly by serious journalists excommunicated from the media establishment for tackling subjects like the CIA's role in drug smuggling, lies perpetuated by the investigators of TWA flight 800, POWs rotting in Vietnam, a Korean war massacre, the disenfranchisement of black voters in Bush's election, bovine growth hormone's dangers and a host of other unpopular issues.

Borjesson describes "the buzzsaw" as "what can rip through you when you try to investigate or expose anything this country's large institutions -- be they corporate or government -- want to keep under wraps. The system fights back with official lies, disinformation, and stonewalling.

Your phone starts acting funny. Strange people call you at strange hours to give you strange information. The FBI calls you. Your car is broken into and the thief takes your computer and your reporter's notebook and leaves everything else behind ... The sense of fear and paranoia is, at times, overwhelming."

The majority of the eighteen pieces in Borjesson's book are about hard-working mainstream journalists, dedicated to the ideals of their profession, who stumble into the buzzsaw and have their careers and reputations eviscerated. Though the subjects and personalities involved are wildly diverse, the stories echo each other in disturbing ways. Journalists are sent by their bosses to do their jobs -- in the case of Borjesson, to investigate the crash of TWA Fight 800 as a producer for CBS news. Sometimes what they find is impolitic, other times it brings threats of corporate lawsuits. Suddenly, editors kill the story, or demand changes. In some instances, like that of TV reporter Jane Akre, who was investigating the use of Monsanto's Bovine Growth Hormone, reporters are ordered to insert outright lies in their pieces or face firing. Other times, like with Gerard Colby's book about the Du Pont family and Gary Webb's San Jose Mercury News series about the CIA's role in the crack epidemic, the bosses are spooked after the fact and withdraw their support from work already published, hanging reporters out to dry.

In the aftermath of Enron, plenty of journalists came forward to publicly wring their hands about the press's failure to catch the story before it destroyed the life savings of thousands. Since then, though, there's been little sign of renewed vigilance towards malfeasance at other companies, even though many have written that Enron's business practices weren't particularly unusual. Without addressing Enron directly, "Into the Buzzsaw" makes it pretty clear why this is by showing how journalists who took on companies like Monsanto and Du Pont were abandoned by their own editors and publishers and embroiled in lawsuits.

When they speak out, buzzsaw victims are usually treated as paranoid conspiracy theorists. Competing outlets valiantly defend the status quo --The New York Times, The Washington Post and the LA Times launched concurrent attacks on Gary Webb's series, eventually derailing his career and causing his paper to print a retraction (though not of any specific facts mentioned in the story). Writing of this episode in is book "Whiteout," Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair said, "From the savage assaults on Webb by other members of his profession, those unfamiliar with the series might have assumed that Webb had made a series of wild and unsubstantiated charges, long on dramatic speculation and short of specific data or sourcing. In fact, Webb's series was succinct and narrowly focused."

Borjesson was subject to similar attempts at character assassination by her former peers. After Borjesson was fired from CBS, she was asked to develop a pilot for a new investigative series to be overseen by Oliver Stone. She gathered over thirty eyewitnesses who disputed the official government story, but before production even started, other journalists started sneering at the project. Newsweek called Stone the "latest conspiracy crank to delve into the mysterious crash." Time Magazine chimed in with an article headlined "The Conspiracy Channel?" The New York Times dismissed Borjesson's reporting simply because government agencies denied its truth (never mind they were the very agencies Borjesson was investigating).

There's something of an X-Files feel to a lot of these stories, though not in the way that condescending guardians of official truth think. Rather, their surreal feeling comes from the first-person experiences of people finding the institutions they've served all their lives suddenly turning on them. As Borjesson writes, "Walk into the buzzsaw and you'll cut right to this layer of reality. You will feel a deep sense of loss and betrayal. A shocking shift in paradigm. Anyone who hasn't experienced it will call you crazy. Those who don't know the truth, or are covering it up, will call you a conspiracy nut."

In fact, that's just what a lot of these writers have been called. Once a journalist has been tossed out of the inner circle, anything they write can be smeared as sour grapes or mere ranting. The media has already branded them unreliable, so their charges are extremely unlikely to be taken seriously.

A similar thing happens to other progressive media critics. It's not that the media isn't interested in media stories -- see the blanket coverage of Tina Brown's foibles at Talk. It's just that few are interested in critiques that challenge the very essence of journalists' romantic dreams of themselves as Robert Redford playing Bob Woodward in "All the Presidents Men." Right-wingers like "Bias" author Bernard Goldberg tend to get much more attention, perhaps because their insights don't threaten most journalists' cherished self-conceptions.

While most alternative press readers are familiar with Noam Chomsky's scrupulous documentation of the way government lies become the media's conventional wisdom and with Robert McChesney (who wrote Buzzsaw's conclusion) and Mark Crispin Millers' analysis of corporate consolidation, they are routinely written off by those policing the perimeters of acceptable debate. They hardly ever appear in major newspapers or on network TV. While not quibbling with their facts, most media people tar them as alarmists or unrealistic utopians.

Indeed, some of the writers in Buzzsaw say that, before their own experiences, they were among the scoffers. Webb writes, "If we had met five years ago, you wouldn't have found a more staunch defender of the newspaper industry than me ... I was winning awards, getting raises, lecturing college classes, appearing on TV shows, and judging journalism contests. So how could I possibly agree with people like Noam Chomsky and Ben Bagdikian, who were claiming the system didn't work, that it was steered by powerful special interests and corporations, and existed to protect the power elite?"

But, like most of the contributors to "Into the Buzzsaw," he did his job too well and the powers that be hurled him onto the other side of the looking glass. "And then I wrote some stories that made me realize how sadly misplaced my bliss had been," he writes. "The reason I'd enjoyed such smooth sailing for so long hadn't been, as I'd assumed, because I was careful and diligent and good at my job ... The truth was that, in all those years, I hadn't written anything important enough to suppress."

The routine maginalizing of media critics is one reason "Into the Buzzsaw" is so important. It might be possible to discredit one erstwhile insider, but to argue that more than a dozen veterans of organizations like CBS News, CNN, The AP, The BBC and The San Jose Mercury News are all crazy in exactly the same way would be to engage in conspiracy-mongering more far-fetched than anything these authors are accused of. And while plenty of lefty writers have excoriated media monopolies, rarely has the precise way that corporate ownership and intimidation warp newsroom values been made quite so explicit. The value of these testimonies is largely in their minute accumulation of detail (which occasionally makes for tedious reading but enhances credibility).

Borjesson is especially systematic, laying out every meeting, every conversation, every contradiction in government statements.

Some contributors aren't quite so convincing. The book as a whole would have been stronger without April Oliver's self-serving piece about her involvement in CNN's Tailwind debacle and subsequent firing. She doesn't bother to refute the charges made against her or defend the finer points of her work, which makes her essay seem like a self-serving screed. But that's just one weak spot in an otherwise appallingly convincing book, a book that suggests that the truth about our media-military-industrial complex might go beyond even our paranoid imaginings.

Beyond the specifics of each story, "Into the Buzzsaw" is about how the elite sector of the media to bestows the imprimatur of truth on its own interpretations of the world. In the current landscape, of course, these same outlets largely take it upon themselves to determine which books should be deemed serious. It will be interesting to see if "Into the Buzzsaw" gets any play in the outlets it exposes.

Don't count on it.


Michelle Goldberg is a freelance journalist based in Brooklyn.

Source: http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=12753

Back to top
 
 

United we stand. Divided they fall.
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Gangstalking
Administrator
*****


Happy New Year

Posts: 2925
Re: SNITCH CULTURE. (This is a must read article)
Reply #4 - Apr 13th, 2009, 11:07am
 
Quote from Gangstalking on Feb 3rd, 2008, 10:51pm:
I have posted about this before, but I will post about it again. This is what the system does to you when you get out of line.

It does not matter wither you are an activist, dissident, whistle-blower, journalist, cointelpro target, gang stalking, mobbing, bullying (in some cases), etc.

It's all the same thing in different degrees on sliding scales. After investigating mobbing extensively, by experiencing it, and reading the various works, it's became very obvious that not only does it serve to keep these people in line, or to push them to the edge so that they jump, but if they try to fight back, the system just pounds them. Lawyers, judges, tribunals, they find they are met with obsticles at every turn, and by the time many finish trying to go up against the system, they are finished, finacially, emotionally, mentally. Many mobbing targets are never able to work again.

I came across the same thing with the stories of bullying, and Tim Fields had started to look into collusion, and what happens there, the same thing.

Dissidents such as Peter Duesberg, who tried to say that his findings with the HIV virus did not meet with what the mainstream was saying, lost all his funding grants, and now he has pretty much nothing. It's again what happens in every single industry when you try to go up against the main stream.

Think medival times and someone trying to explain the fact that the planet earth was not the center of the universe, or that the earth was not flat. We like to think that we have outgrown those times, but the status quo still protects it's ideas, and if you find something that does not match, you might as well keep it to yourself, or be ready to be excummunitcated from the system. It's creepy, and yet this is what the world is like. I would not have believed it just a year and a half ago. Many reading this will never believe it, unless it happens to them, and even then some still won't get it.

Back to top
 
 

United we stand. Divided they fall.
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print